1 x Velociraptor vs 2 x 7200rpm RAID hard drives for HD editing? - velociraptor hd
Which option is best?
If I go the RAID option to the size of the disk, which would be the best setting for HD?
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Velociraptor Hd 1 X Velociraptor Vs 2 X 7200rpm RAID Hard Drives For HD Editing?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I am a part of my 2 hard drives (2x320GB 7200 rpm) running in RAID 0 and some in RAID 1
RAID 0 and 1 or two typical options. RAID 0 makes reading and writing to disk faster and RAID 1 is actually saved a whole (backup exactly the same on 2 separate disks, but reads only).
I ran some benchmarks, and my 2 hard drives in RAID 0 will be 90% of the speed of a Velociraptor. Since it is much cheaper to buy two units of 7,200 instead of 15,000 device, I mean, no doubt, have two units of 7200th
EDIT:
I take that back. I ran a benchmark and me about 10% faster than the Velociraptor, and min only 10,000 rpm. 111MB/sec
2 discs will always be faster than 1
However, the best solution would be to use --
2 x 7200 RAID-1 (for HD content - Play)
1: Writing x Velociraptor 10000rpm (to the ultimate high-definition editing)
The more spindles you have - the best performance, HD content and large files to be low, is ideal for this type of configuration.
I just wanted to add, I think that drives smaller, faster execution.
Post a Comment